Home

Advertisement

Customize
 
 
23 June 2009 @ 10:21 pm
 
Oh boy, I have it bad:

my mother: *scratches the pastry board with a knife, vigorously*
Susan: *jumps out of her chair and starts dancing Charleston*


I'm also slowly going through the YouTube's twenties-related videos, and I've noticed something funny: most people apparently see this era as some kind of a long-gone golden age of chastity, to which our tainted, bitter, experienced modern world can't even compare. Let me tell you, oblivious commenters of YouTube, that looking at a flapper and seeing a meek, innocent girl is one hell of a misinterpretation.

The 1920's, all the roaring craze they were, happened because people needed to release the World War I trauma. People didn't want to be moderate, serious and quiet, and that's why the twenties were like a ten-year-long festival, and not one of chastity. Flapper dresses barely covered knees (and uncovered them completely when you danced Charleston, for example ;)), which doesn't really sound outrageous from today's perspective - but ninety years ago people didn't have today's perspective; ninety years ago short skirts were seen for the first time in history, and it was a revolution.
The Victorians were chaste and well-behaved. The Edwardians, yeah. The flappers?

The flapper girls refused to wear corsets, instead putting on light, short, sleeveless dresses. They smoked cigarettes, drove cars, cut their hair, and wore make-up (earlier associated only with prostitutes). And took part in petting parties (which is something I was really surprised to learn. I mean, petting parties? And they say the sixties was when the sexual revolution begun!). And voted. All of these, as far as I know, for the first time in the known history.

Actually, to me, women from the twenties are more independent and modern and generally ass-kicking than, for example, those from the fifties (it's not that I don't like the fifties, or something - I do. But women were not free in this decade). To prove which, I'm posting this picture, that really tells more than thousand words:



Image and video hosting by TinyPic


*grin* How can you not love them? :DD It's easy for us, now, to be independent and oh-so-rebellious. Imagine what it was like with Victorian matrons still alive, kicking and putting out your cigarettes all around.
 
 
( 2 comments — Post a new comment )
πππππ[info]_mikan_ on June 25th, 2009 01:15 pm (UTC)
Speaking of the 1920s, this tryptich by the painter Otto Dix from the 20s always comes to my mind. You can see wounded former soldiers in it as well as celebrations and people in fancy cloths. So as you wrote, people are trying to release the WW I trauma which is still present on the streets with cripples and beggars.
altogether susan: flapper!susan[info]waeter on June 29th, 2009 02:58 pm (UTC)
Yeah, it does reflect well what this age was like, and why it was like that.
 
 

Advertisement

Customize